Pasar al contenido principal

page search

Biblioteca Getting to the root of the matter: landscape implications of plant-fungal interactions for tree migration in Alaska

Getting to the root of the matter: landscape implications of plant-fungal interactions for tree migration in Alaska

Getting to the root of the matter: landscape implications of plant-fungal interactions for tree migration in Alaska

Resource information

Date of publication
Diciembre 2016
Resource Language
ISBN / Resource ID
AGRIS:US201600123765
Pages
895-911

CONTEXT: Forecasting the expansion of forest into Alaska tundra is critical to predicting regional ecosystem services, including climate feedbacks such as carbon storage. Controls over seedling establishment govern forest development and migration potential. Ectomycorrhizal fungi (EMF), obligate symbionts of all Alaskan tree species, are particularly important to seedling establishment, yet their significance to landscape vegetation change is largely unknown. OBJECTIVE: We used ALFRESCO, a landscape model of wildfire and vegetation dynamics, to explore whether EMF inoculum potential influences patterns of tundra afforestation and associated flammability. METHODS: Using two downscaled CMIP3 general circulation models (ECHAM5 and CCCMA) and a mid-range emissions scenario (A1B) at a 1 km² resolution, we compared simulated tundra afforestation rates and flammability from four parameterizations of EMF effects on seedling establishment and growth from 2000 to 2100. RESULTS: Modeling predicted an 8.8–18.2 % increase in forest cover from 2000 to 2100. Simulations that explicitly represented landscape variability in EMF inoculum potential showed a reduced percent change afforestation of up to a 2.8 % due to low inoculum potential limiting seedling growth. This reduction limited fuel availability and thus, cumulative area burned. Regardless of inclusion of EMF effects in simulations, landscape flammability was lower for simulations driven by the wetter and cooler CCCMA model than the warmer and drier ECHAM5 model, while tundra afforestation was greater. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest abiotic factors are the primary driver of tree migration. Simulations including EMF effects, a biotic factor, yielded more conservative estimates of land cover change across Alaska that better-matched empirical estimates from the previous century.

Share on RLBI navigator
NO

Authors and Publishers

Author(s), editor(s), contributor(s)

Hewitt, Rebecca E.
Bennett, Alec P.
Breen, Amy L.
Hollingsworth, Teresa N.
Taylor, D. Lee
Chapin, F. Stuart, III
Rupp, T. Scott

Publisher(s)
Data Provider