Resource information
PURPOSE: Many Mediterranean drylands are characterized by strong erosion in headwater catchments, where connectivity processes play an important role in the redistribution of water and sediments. Sediment connectivity describes the ease with which sediment can move through a catchment. The spatial and temporal characterization of connectivity patterns in a catchment enables the estimation of sediment contribution and transfer paths. Apart from topography, vegetation cover is one of the main factors driving sediment connectivity. This is particularly true for the patchy vegetation cover typical of many dryland environments. Several connectivity measures have been developed in the last few years. At the same time, advances in remote sensing have enabled an improved catchment-wide estimation of ground cover at the subpixel level using hyperspectral imagery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The objective of this study was to assess the sediment connectivity for two adjacent subcatchments (~70 km²) of the Isábena River in the Spanish Pyrenees in contrasting seasons using a quantitative connectivity index based on fractional vegetation cover and topography data. The fractional cover of green vegetation, non-photosynthetic vegetation, bare soil and rock were derived by applying a multiple endmember spectral mixture analysis approach to the hyperspectral image data. Sediment connectivity was mapped using the index of connectivity, in which the effect of land cover on runoff and sediment fluxes is expressed by a spatially distributed weighting factor. In this study, the cover and management factor (C factor) of the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE) was used as a weighting factor. Bi-temporal C factor maps were derived by linking the spatially explicit fractional ground cover and vegetation height obtained from the airborne data to the variables of the RUSLE subfactors. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: The resulting connectivity maps show that areas behave very differently with regard to connectivity, depending on the land cover and on the spatial distribution of vegetation abundances and topographic barriers. Most parts of the catchment show higher connectivity values in August as compared to April. The two subcatchments show a slightly different connectivity behaviour that reflects the different land cover proportions and their spatial configuration. CONCLUSIONS: The connectivity estimation can support a better understanding of processes controlling the redistribution of water and sediments from the hillslopes to the channel network at a scale appropriate for land management. It allows hot spot areas of erosion to be identified and the effects of erosion control measures, as well as different land management scenarios, to be studied.
