Passar para o conteúdo principal

page search

Biblioteca Evaluation and Screening of Co-Culture Farming Models in Rice Field Based on Food Productivity

Evaluation and Screening of Co-Culture Farming Models in Rice Field Based on Food Productivity

Evaluation and Screening of Co-Culture Farming Models in Rice Field Based on Food Productivity

Resource information

Date of publication
Dezembro 2019
Resource Language
ISBN / Resource ID
LP-midp002343

Traditional farming practice of rice field co-culture is a time-tested example of sustainable agriculture, which increases food productivity of arable land with few adverse environmental impacts. However, the small-scale farming practice needs to be adjusted for modern agricultural production. Screening of rice field co-culture farming models is important in deciding the suitable model for industry-wide promotion. In this study, we aim to find the optimal rice field co-culture farming models for large-scale application, based on the notion of food productivity. We used experimental data from the Jiangsu Province of China and applied food-equivalent unit and arable-land-equivalent unit methods to examine applicable protocols for large-scale promotion of rice field co-culture farming models. Results indicate that the rice-loach and rice-catfish models achieve the highest food productivity; the rice-duck model increases the rice yield, while the rice-turtle and rice-crayfish models generate extra economic profits. Simultaneously considering economic benefits, staple food security, and regional food output, we recommend the rice-duck, rice-crayfish, and rice-catfish models. Simulating provincial promotion of the above three models, we conclude that food output increases from all three recommended models, as well as the land production capacity. The rice-catfish co-culture model has the most substantial food productivity. None of the three models threatens staple food security, as they do not compete for land resources with rice cultivation.

Share on RLBI navigator
NO

Authors and Publishers

Author(s), editor(s), contributor(s)

Jin, TaoGe, CandiGao, HuiZhang, HongchengSun, Xiaolong

Corporate Author(s)
Geographical focus