Resource information
Most researchers examining poverty and
multilateral trade liberalization have had to examine
average, or per capita effects, suggesting that if per
capita real income rises, poverty will fall. This inference
can be misleading. Combining results from a new
international cross-section consumption analysis with
earnings data from household surveys, this article analyzes
the implications of multilateral trade liberalization for
poverty in Indonesia. It finds that the aggregate reduction
in Indonesia's national poverty headcount following
global trade liberalization masks a more complex set of
impacts across groups. In the short run the poverty
headcount rises slightly for self-employed agricultural
households, as agricultural profits fail to keep up with
increases in consumer prices. In the long run the poverty
headcount falls for all earnings strata, as increased demand
for unskilled workers lifts incomes for the formerly
self-employed, some of whom move into the wage labor market.
A decomposition of the poverty changes in Indonesia
associated with different countries' trade policies
finds that reform in other countries leads to a reduction in
poverty in Indonesia but that liberalization of
Indonesia's trade policies leads to an increase. The
method used here can be readily extended to any of the other
13 countries in the sample.
