Skip to main content

page search

Community Organizations ScienceDirect
ScienceDirect
ScienceDirect
Publishing Company

Location

Netherlands
Working languages
English
Affiliated Organization
Publishing Company

Elsevier is a world-leading provider of information solut

What is ScienceDirect

Elsevier’s leading platform of peer-reviewed scholarly literature.

University libraries and institutions offer ScienceDirect access to their communities of researchers.

Researchers, teachers, students, healthcare and information professionals use ScienceDirect to improve the way they search, discover, read, understand and share scholarly research.

Members:

Resources

Displaying 176 - 180 of 284

Critical factors for crop-livestock integration beyond the farm level: A cross-analysis of worldwide case studies

Peer-reviewed publication
March, 2018
United Kingdom
United States of America
Asia
Europe

Despite their recognized agricultural sustainability benefits, mixed crop-livestock farms have declined in the Northern hemisphere. As such, crop-livestock integration beyond the farm level is a promising alternative to this trend, but the knowledge of critical factors and strategies towards its successful implementation is still lacking. We developed an analytical framework to assess the critical determinants of the emergence and outcomes of integration, which helped us understand farmers’ collective strategies for reducing integration transaction costs.

Wealth and the distribution of benefits from tropical forests: Implications for REDD+

Peer-reviewed publication
February, 2018
Global

Interventions to strengthen forest conservation in tropical biomes face multiple challenges. Insecure land tenure and unequal benefit sharing within forest user groups are two of the most important. Using original household-level survey data from 130 villages in six countries, we assess how current wealth inequality relates to tenure security and benefit flows from forest use. We find that villages with higher wealth inequality report lower tenure security and more unequal flows from forest income and externally sourced income.

Triangulation in participation: Dynamic approaches for science-practice interaction in land-use decision making in rural China

Peer-reviewed publication
February, 2018
China
Norway
Russia
United States of America

Land use decision making requires knowledge integration from a wide range of stakeholders across science and practice. Many participatory methods and instruments aiming at such science-practice interaction have been developed during the last decades. However, there are methodological challenges, and little evidence neither about the methodological applicability and practicability under diverse socio-political conditions nor about their dynamics. The objective of this paper is to offer some insights on the design and implementation of reasonable science-practice interaction.

Adaptive biodiversity management of semi-natural hay meadows: The case of West-Norway

Peer-reviewed publication
February, 2018
Norway
United States of America

Worldwide semi-natural habitats of high biological value are in decline. Consequently, numerous Agri-Environment Schemes (AESs) intended to halt biodiversity loss within these habitats have been implemented. One approach has been the application of “adaptive management”, where scientific knowledge is applied alongside the traditional ecological knowledge (TEK) of stakeholders in order to establish an integrated approach that is adjusted as outcomes are assessed. In this paper we examine the effectiveness of the adaptive management approach of Norway’s Action Plan for Hay Meadows (APHM).

Land ownership and technology adoption revisited: Improved maize varieties in Ethiopia

Peer-reviewed publication
February, 2018
Ethiopia

The lack of land ownership can discourage agricultural technology adoption, yet there is scarce evidence of the impact of land rental contracts on the adoption of improved crop varieties in developing countries. The current study investigates such impact using a nationally representative survey of Ethiopian maize farmers. In contrast to many previous studies, we show in a simple model that cash-renters are as likely to adopt improved maize varieties as owner-operators, while sharecroppers are more likely to adopt given that such varieties are profitable.