Overslaan en naar de inhoud gaan

page search

Library From Hill tribes to Indigenous Peoples: The localisation of a global movement in Thailand

From Hill tribes to Indigenous Peoples: The localisation of a global movement in Thailand

From Hill tribes to Indigenous Peoples: The localisation of a global movement in Thailand
From Hill tribes to Indigenous Peoples

Resource information

Date of publication
januari 2019
Resource Language
ISBN / Resource ID
doi:10.1017/S0022463419000031
Pages
25
License of the resource

This article presents a chronology of the growth of the concept of Indigeneity in Thailand, analysing the particular ways in which the global Indigenous movement has taken root in the country. In Thailand, transnational support networks and the opening of political associational space played key roles in facilitating the growth of, first, a regional, and later a national Indigenous movement during the 1980s and early 2000s, respectively. Indigenous Peoples in Thailand are asserting their identity by drawing on a new concept of Indigeneity being promoted by the United Nations and other international advocacy organisations that identifies them not only as first peoples, but crucially as colonised or oppressed peoples. Indigenous Peoples in Thailand are further asserting both their cultural distinctiveness and their compatibility with the Thai nation. The Indigenous movement in Thailand differs from movements in Australia, Canada, and the United States where Indigenous Peoples must perform their cultural distinctiveness to maintain political recognition, and in turn are accused of being not different enough when exercising their rights. In Thailand, rather, Indigenous Peoples are accused of being not Thai enough in their efforts to push for any political recognition. While the Thai government denies the relevance of the concept of Indigeneity to Thailand, it is clear that the Indigenous movement in Thailand has grown since the early 2000s. In fact, state policies between the 1950s and early 2000s contributed toward the scaling-up of a pan-Hill tribe identity among the core groups associated with the movement.

Share on RLBI navigator
NO

Authors and Publishers

Author(s), editor(s), contributor(s)

Micah F. Morton and Ian G. Baird

Geographical focus