Overslaan en naar de inhoud gaan

page search

Library Expert knowledge for translating land cover/use maps to General Habitat Categories (GHC)

Expert knowledge for translating land cover/use maps to General Habitat Categories (GHC)

Expert knowledge for translating land cover/use maps to General Habitat Categories (GHC)

Resource information

Date of publication
december 2014
Resource Language
ISBN / Resource ID
AGRIS:US201400134665
Pages
1045-1067

Monitoring biodiversity at the level of habitats and landscape is becoming widespread in Europe and elsewhere as countries establish international and national habitat conservation policies and monitoring systems. Earth Observation (EO) data offers a potential solution to long-term biodiversity monitoring through direct mapping of habitats or by integrating Land Cover/Use (LC/LU) maps with contextual spatial information and in situ data. Therefore, it appears necessary to develop an automatic/semi-automatic translation framework of LC/LU classes to habitat classes, but also challenging due to discrepancies in domain definitions. In the context of the FP7 BIO_SOS ( www.biosos.eu ) project, the authors demonstrated the feasibility of the Food and Agricultural Organization Land Cover Classification System (LCCS) taxonomy to habitat class translation. They also developed a framework to automatically translate LCCS classes into the recently proposed General Habitat Categories classification system, able to provide an exhaustive typology of habitat types, ranging from natural ecosystems to urban areas around the globe. However discrepancies in terminology, plant height criteria and basic principles between the two mapping domains inducing a number of one-to-many and many-to-many relations were identified, revealing the need of additional ecological expert knowledge to resolve the ambiguities. This paper illustrates how class phenology, class topological arrangement in the landscape, class spectral signature from multi-temporal Very High spatial Resolution (VHR) satellite imagery and plant height measurements can be used to resolve such ambiguities. Concerning plant height, this paper also compares the mapping results obtained by using accurate values extracted from LIght Detection And Ranging (LIDAR) data and by exploiting EO data texture features (i.e. entropy) as a proxy of plant height information, when LIDAR data are not available. An application for two Natura 2000 coastal sites in Southern Italy is discussed.

Share on RLBI navigator
NO

Authors and Publishers

Author(s), editor(s), contributor(s)

Adamo, Maria
Tarantino, Cristina
Tomaselli, Valeria
Kosmidou, Vasiliki
Petrou, Zisis
Manakos, Ioannis
Lucas, Richard M.
Mücher, Caspar A.
Veronico, Giuseppe
Marangi, Carmela
De Pasquale, Vito
Blonda, Palma

Publisher(s)
Data Provider
Geographical focus