Aller au contenu principal

page search

Community Organizations Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Acronym
FAO
United Nations Agency

Focal point

Javier Molina Cruz
Phone number
+390657051

Location

Headquarters
Viale delle Terme di Caracalla
00153
Rome
Italy
Working languages
Arabic
Chinese
English
Spanish
French

The Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations leads international efforts to defeat hunger. Serving both developed and developing countries, FAO acts as a neutral forum where all nations meet as equals to negotiate agreements and debate policy. FAO is also a source of knowledge and information. We help developing countries and countries in transition modernize and improve agriculture, forestry and fisheries practices and ensure good nutrition for all. Since our founding in 1945, we have focused special attention on developing rural areas, home to 70 percent of the world's poor and hungry people.

Members:

Naomi Kenney
Ilario Rea
Ana Paula De Lao
Marianna Bicchieri
Valerio Tranchida
Dubravka Bojic
Margret Vidar
Brad Paterson
Carolina Cenerini
VG Tenure
Stefanie Neno
Julien Custot
Francesca Gianfelici
Giulio DiStefano
Renata Mirulla
Gerard Ciparisse
Jeff Tschirley
Marieaude Even
Richard Eberlin
Yannick Fiedler
Rumyana Tonchovska
Ann-Kristin Rothe
Sally Bunning
Imma Subirats

Resources

Displaying 3126 - 3130 of 5074

Réforme agraire: colonisation et coopératives agricoles 2007/2

Journal Articles & Books
Novembre, 2007
Égypte
Suisse
Lituanie
Croatie
Allemagne
Danemark
Australie
Canada
Finlande
Thaïlande
Nouvelle-Zélande
Kenya
Tadjikistan
Albanie
Italie
Botswana
Cambodge
Géorgie
Roumanie
Ghana
Europe
Asie

The articles in this issue supplement the recent publication "Good governance in land tenure and administration" (Land Tenure Studies No. 9), which provides practical advice for land professionals on improving governance in a land administration system or other land tenure arrangement.

Les mangroves d’Océanie 1980-2005: Rapports nationaux

Reports & Research
Novembre, 2007
France
Suisse
Fidji
Samoa
Îles Marshall
Micronésie
Australie
Tonga
Guinée
Nouvelle-Zélande
Palaos
Japon
Kiribati
Malaisie
Italie
Papouasie-Nouvelle-Guinée
Nauru
Océanie

The world’s mangroves 1980–2005 is a thematic study undertaken within the framework of the Global Forest Resources Assessment 2005. It was led by FAO in collaboration with mangrove specialists throughout the world, and was co-funded by the International Tropical Timber Organization (ITTO). It builds on the 1980 assessment, on the FAO Global Forest Resources Assessment 2000 (FRA 2000) and 2005 (FRA 2005), and on an extensive literature search and correspondence with mangrove and forest resources assessment specialists.

Negotiation and mediation techniques for natural resource management

Journal Articles & Books
Novembre, 2007
Angola
Népal
États-Unis d'Amérique
Zambie
Afrique du Sud
Gambie
Mali
Suède
Zimbabwe
Italie
Botswana
Allemagne
Namibie

This publication is part of a series of training materials on natural resources conflict management developed by FAOs Livelihood Support Programme. It supports the discussions presented in Negotiation and mediation techniques for natural resource management (2005) a conceptual guide by sharing recent, real-life experiences of Africans who have used the processes and principles of consensual negotiation and mediation to address natural resource conflicts.

Framework perspective on local participation in policy: Views through FAO experience

Journal Articles & Books
Novembre, 2007
Mozambique
Honduras
Pays-Bas
Philippines
Afrique du Sud
El Salvador
Allemagne
Italie
République arabe syrienne
Bolivie
Cambodge
Canada
Brésil
Kenya

The goal of this exercise is to identify some of the tools a development agent needs for achieving effective local participation in policy development. The intended audiences are FAO professionals and their colleagues, in other agencies and in the field programs. This paper uses an analogy of walking and climbing to separate the familiar project experiences (the walking) from the less-known territory of policy influence (the climbing).