Logo

page search

Данные - Statistical Data Institutional overlap

Institutional overlap

Institutional overlap

Institutional overlap measured on a scale from A - which stands for good practices - to D - reflecting weak practices. For more information please visit http://go.worldbank.org/21M7S7AZO0

Data definitions:

Land tenure rights recognition (rural)
Land tenure rights recognition (urban)
Rural group rights recognition
Urban group rights recognition in informal areas
Opportunities for tenure individualization
Mapping/registration of communal land
Registration of individual rural land
Formal recognition of women's right
Condominium regime
Compensation due to land use changes
Non-documentary evidence to recognize rights
Recognition of long-term possession
Formal fees for 1st time registration low
No high informal fees for 1st time registration
Formalizing housing is feasible & affordable
Clear process for formal recognition of possession
Restrictions on urban land use, ownership and transferability
Restrictions on rural land use, ownership and transferability
Clear separation of institutional roles
Institutional overlap
Administrative overlap
Information sharing among institutions
Clear land policy developed in a participatory manner
Meaningful incorporation of equity goals
Cost of implementing policy is estimated, matched with benefits, and adequately resourced
Regular, public reports on policy implementation progress
Urban planning based on public input
Rural planning based on public input
Public capture of changes in land use
Speed of land use change
Planned development process: Largest city
Planned development process: Next 4 major cities
Planning copes with urban growth
Plot size adherence
Plans for other uses in line with reality
Requirements for building permits are affordable/transparent
Time to get building permit
Clear process of property valuation
Public availability of valuation rolls
Property tax exemptions justified
Completeness of tax roll
Assessed property taxes are collected
Taxes higher than cost of collection
Public ownership is justified
Complete recording of public land
Management responsibility for public land is clear
Institutions are properly resourced
Public land inventory with public access
Key information on land concessions is public
Expropriated land is used for private purposes
Speed of use of expropriated land
Fair compensation for expropriation of ownership
Fair compensation for expropriation of other rights
Promptness of compensation
Time it takes for a first-instance decision on an appeal
Openness of public land transactions
Collection of payments for public leases
Modalities of lease/sale of public land
Mapping of registry records
Relevant private encumbrances
Relevant public restrictions
Searchability of the registry
Accessibility of registry records
Timely response to requests
Registry focus on client satisfaction
Cadastral/registry info up-to-date
Cost for registering a property transfer
Financial sustainability of registry
Capital investment in the system to record rights
Schedule of fees for services is public
Informal payments discouraged
Access to conflict resolution
Informal dispute resolution is available and recognized
Scope for forum shopping minimized
Possibility of appeals at reasonable cost
Land disputes in the formal court system are low
Speed of formal resolution
Number of long-standing conflicts
Independent & accessible appeal
Registration of individual urban land
Dataset provider:
World Bank Group
License:
Copyright details:

The World Bank Group is committed to open access and strives to enhance public access to and use of data that it collects and publishes.

For more information read the Terms of Use for Datasets Listed in The World Bank Data Catalog

Download indicator

Download indicator

Download this Indicator data.

Measurement unit

Index (A; D)

Best value is

Low

Related issues

Related LandVoc tags