Resource information
The study analysed the influence of presence of protected area on the vulnerability and resilience of the surrounding region in different socio-economic and natural shocks and perturbations. For the study two areas were selected: area of Triglav national park (TNP), as area with highly diversified rural tourism and area of Kozjansko regional park (KRP) as area with low level of rural tourism diversification. The primary data collection was conducted with use of in-depth interviews among relevant stakeholders. In each area some interviews were carried out, where some interviews were representing multiple stakeholders also. The results of the analysis mostly confirmed our hypothesis. We could recognize that the diversity of actors and social roles are essential as sources of stabilty, resilience, robustness and integrity in the social dimension of natural resource management, that an ecological regime shift or collapse does not necessarily result in a regime-shift or collapse of the social-ecological system, that an adaptive governance framework relies critically on the collaboration of a diverse set of stakeholders operating at different social and ecological scales, that good governance of the socio-economic domain does not necessarily imply maintaining a stable / resilient / robust / integer social-ecological system and that institutions, social networks and organisation interact across scales. On the other hand a hypothesis that more diverse tourism leads to higher stabilty, resilience, robustness and integrity of social-ecological systems was not confirmed.
V raziskavi je bil preučevan vpliv prisotnosti zavarovanega območja na ranljivost in pro_nost _ir_e regije ob različnih socio-ekonomskih in naravnih _okih in motnjah. Raziskava je bila izpeljana na območju Triglavskega narodnega parka (TNP), kot območju z visoko stopnjo raznolikosti turistične ponudbe in Kozjanskega regijskega parka (KRP), kot območja z ozkim spektrom turistične ponudbe. Primarni podatki so bili zbrani s poglobljenimi intervjuji z glavnimi akterji. V vsakem območju smo izvedli več intervjujev, pri čemer so v posameznih primerih intervjuvanci zastopali tudi po več dele_nikov. Rezultati analize so prete_no potrdili zastavljene raziskovalne hipoteze. Ugotovljeno je bilo, da je raznolikost aktivnih udele_encev in socialnih vlog bistvenega pomena kot vir stabilnosti, pro_nosti, _ilavosti in celovitosti dru_bene komponente upravljanja z naravnimi viri; da sprememba ali propad ekolo_kega re_ima ne pomeni nujno spremembe ali propada socio-ekolo_kega sistema; da je adaptivni okvir vodenja kritično odvisen od sodelovanja med različnimi akterji na različnih dru_benih in okoljskih ravneh; da uspe_no upravljanje socio-ekonomskega področja ne pomeni nujno tudi ohranjanja stabilnega / pro_nega / _ilavega in celovitega socio-ekolo_kega sistema in da in_titucije, dru_bena omre_ja in organizacije medsebojno sodelujejo preko večih ravni. Na drugi strani je bilo ugotovljeno, da različna raven diverzifikacije turistične ponudbe ne prispeva k vi_ji ravni stabilnosti, pro_nosti, _ilavosti in celovitosti socio-ekolo_kega sistema.
